INF STD 211: Artifacts & Cultures
INF STD 240: Management of Digital Records
INF STD 260: Description & Access
INF STD 262A: Data Management and Practice
INF STD 270: Systems and Infrastructures
INF STD 272: Human/Computer Interaction (HCI)
INF STD 206: Intro to Economics of Information
INF STD 212: Values and Communities in Information Professions
INF STD 262B: Data Curation and Policy
DH 201: Introduction to Digital Humanities
INF STD 289: Special Issues in Information Studies: Data Informatics
INF STD 498: Internship
INF STD 241: Digital Preservation
INF STD 400: Portfolio and Professional Development
INF STD: Historical Methodology of Information Studies
INF STD 279: User Experience Design
INF STD 288: Research Apprenticeship Course
INF STD 289: Special Issues in Information Studies: Digital Asset Management
Professor Blanchette served as my advisor throughout my MLIS candidacy. We met regularly to discuss my coursework, professional goals, and development of my portfolio.
Field Garthwaite supervised me during my internship at IRIS.TV in the Summer of 2019.
Michele "Mimi" Loran was my supervisor at TMZ during my Fall 2019 internship in the company’s Metadata Department.
The presence of disinformation on crowdfunding platforms has harmful consequences for both users and internet companies. Disinformation can destabilize a user’s trust while jeopardizing a company's growth. As the internet enabled stronger lines of communication and eased access to larger audiences, crowdfunding companies capitalized on this phenomenon to widen their scope. The greater accessibility to donations, however, ultimately facilitated the perpetuation of fraudulent schemes. Fraudulent postings pose a financial risk to users, while undermining the mission and reputation of a crowdfunding company, draining its finances, and leaving it legally liable. This paper will examine disinformation on crowdfunding platforms using GoFundMe.com as a case study. To deter misinformation on crowdfunding sites, I will argue that content moderation and analysis, transparency, and regulation are essential in maintaining user trust, and information professionals are best suited to implement these recommendations of fraud detection and mitigation.